| RE: Spider-Man 3 Thread -
Posted on 09-05-2007 18:47 |
|
Phil
Vigilante
Awards:
| 
Posts: 2061
Location: Gotham City
Joined: 30.07.05
 |
|
probably new director, new cast, new everything right? i've had enough of tobey anyways. he's great, but he didn't really look or sound like the peter parker i imagined.
i hope the next movie will be like a team up of spidey and venom against carnage. despite his "death" in spidey 3, i think he's gonna come back some how. and as for the movies afterwards...i'm really hoping for a story about ben reily(his clone).
http://batmanytb.com/pictures/thumbnails.php?album=4 |
  |
| RE: Spider-Man 3 Thread -
Posted on 09-05-2007 19:29 |
|
batboy99
W. Tech. Manager
Awards:
None
|
Posts: 1550
Location: Toronto,Ontario Canada
Joined: 20.10.05
|
|
at this point,i dont want any recasts,earier would have been better,not onw
Batman YTB is the best site on the net!
 |
 |
| RE: Spider-Man 3 Thread -
Posted on 09-05-2007 19:33 |
|
|
batboy99
W. Tech. Manager
Awards:
None
|
Posts: 1550
Location: Toronto,Ontario Canada
Joined: 20.10.05
|
|
real-dark-knight wrote:
batboy99 wrote:
i think marvel has characters that are more interesting to bring into movie than DC. Basically the only hero i want to see that dc hasnt done yet is WW.i dont want a jla movie,i know for a fact that it will be crap,marvel heroes are better in the movie verse because they have cool powers(xmen,spiderman,fantastic four etc) and their characters stand out more while dc has mainly only 3 that stand out from the rest,not that i wouldnt mind more dc movies,its just marvel movies are so much more exiting! unless its batman,no one can beat him
Well I agree with the last sentence at least.
What about Superman?? You had Brandon Routh IS Superman as your signature for months! Before that deadlink to YouTube! Was that a crap film??
How can you think that Superman Returns is so good, and also that Batman Begins is the best Superhero film ever (I'm taking that as a given), yet a JL film would be crap? (can we say crap on BYTB Chris?). I can't work that out. It might be, but it simply CANNOT be worse than the FF film! whoa people take this way too seriously, SR was ok,wasnt the best but better than x3,and i liked brandon because he reminded me alot of reeves and i think jla would be crap because there would be too many characters in the movie,and it would probably suffer from a bad story line,and it would be way too crammed(i thought sm3 was pretty crammed)this is my opinion so you people gotta get off of your high horse..like seriously
Batman YTB is the best site on the net!
|
|
|
| RE: Spider-Man 3 Thread -
Posted on 09-05-2007 19:48 |
|
Chris
Dark Knight
Awards:
| 
Posts: 2999
Location: Richmond, Indiana
Joined: 22.06.05
|
|
There was no High horse.. we're stating facts and points..
So was X-Men crap because it had more than one or two heroes? (not X-3) And now.. it wasn't, and X2 wasn't either because it had a good writer and Director.
Don't pre judge a JLA movie until it happens..
|
  |
| RE: Spider-Man 3 Thread -
Posted on 09-05-2007 19:52 |
|
|
batboy99
W. Tech. Manager
Awards:
None
|
Posts: 1550
Location: Toronto,Ontario Canada
Joined: 20.10.05
|
|
eh,they were ok,x2 was my fav but they werent that great
and i can judge if i want,its my opinion,maybe itll be good,if they take their time,i just hope it isnt rushed like x3 for example because then it wil be crap,i think if they make a jla movie,instead of spendind 1-2 yrs on it,spend a little more time, or just make movies of the individual characters
btw,when i said marvel has more interesting characters,i meant characters that can be made into movies,i find GL interesting for instance,but i dont know how A GL movie would be
Batman YTB is the best site on the net!
|
|
|
| RE: Spider-Man 3 Thread -
Posted on 09-05-2007 20:44 |
|
|
Phil
Vigilante
Awards:
|
Posts: 2061
Location: Gotham City
Joined: 30.07.05
|
|
i actually liked x-men 3...it had enough action to make me feel pumped up. do u guys know what i'm talking about?...300 did a big one for me. i felt really energized after watching 300.
a GL movie would rock! can you imagine how awesome the effects would be with today's CGI? and speaking of DC, isnt there gonna be a green arrow movie? despite what u think batboy, i think DC characters are just as good as marvel...if not better.
http://batmanytb.com/pictures/thumbnails.php?album=4 |
|
|
| RE: Spider-Man 3 Thread -
Posted on 09-05-2007 21:02 |
|
|
batboy99
W. Tech. Manager
Awards:
None
|
Posts: 1550
Location: Toronto,Ontario Canada
Joined: 20.10.05
|
|
eh, they messed up alotta characters in x3 for me
and i think they are making a GA one but isnt it like hes in jail or something like that?
and i take back what i said before, its just im used to marvel making better movies that dc i guess , but i dont know how they woul do a GL movie in terms of storylines, if they do, i hope the main character is hal jordon
Batman YTB is the best site on the net!
|
|
|
| RE: Spider-Man 3 Thread -
Posted on 09-05-2007 21:09 |
|
|
Phil
Vigilante
Awards:
|
Posts: 2061
Location: Gotham City
Joined: 30.07.05
|
|
they "messed" up ra's al ghul and henri ducard in batman begins, heck even falcone...but the movie was still good. but i guess they were just good changes. i dont know much about x-men, so x3 was good enough for me. and probably anyone else who isnt a fan.
http://batmanytb.com/pictures/thumbnails.php?album=4 |
|
|
| RE: Spider-Man 3 Thread -
Posted on 09-05-2007 21:22 |
|
|
batboy99
W. Tech. Manager
Awards:
None
|
Posts: 1550
Location: Toronto,Ontario Canada
Joined: 20.10.05
|
|
ok i admit,i liked x1 and 2,but not x3,they screwed up most of my fav characters,rogue,phoenix,cyclops etc
rogue isnt supposed to be some dimwitted loser who wants to get rid of her powers,shes supposed to be the cocky one who wants to kick arse
phoenix doesnt look like a zombie and act like shes dead nuff said
and cyclops,who the **** kills cyclops?
i admit,the action was good but its still one of my least favorite comic flicks
Btw,werent they supposed ot make a flash movie? now that id like to see, btw,i think a JLA movie would be good if they made it like 3 parts and dont cram everything in into 2 hrs
Batman YTB is the best site on the net!
|
|
|
| RE: Spider-Man 3 Thread -
Posted on 09-05-2007 22:43 |
|
|
Phil
Vigilante
Awards:
|
Posts: 2061
Location: Gotham City
Joined: 30.07.05
|
|
flash movie...maybe in the next few years? lol. and JL probably when we're too old to care. i think a JL movie would be fine in 2 hrs. all they need is 7 members and an alien invasion. just think war of the worlds with superheroes to fight them off, lol.
http://batmanytb.com/pictures/thumbnails.php?album=4
Edited by Phil on 09-05-2007 22:46 |
|
|
| RE: Spider-Man 3 Thread -
Posted on 10-05-2007 01:12 |
|
Drunken Fist
W. Indust. Employee
Awards:
None
|
Posts: 601
Location: Hattiesburg, Mississippi
Joined: 30.07.05
|
|
From my blog, my (late) thoughts on Spider-Man 3...
I went and saw this Friday, and was mostly satisfied. Mind you, I wasn't nearly as excited about this movie as pretty much everybody else I know was. I really enjoy the Spidey movies, but I'm much more interested in the progress of The Dark Knight, the next Batman movie, right now. Plus, the number-one comic-based movie for me this year was 300, and I've already seen that, so my anticipation for Spider-Man 3 wasn't anything out of the ordinary. So, without astronomical expectations, I was more or less satisfied with it. It's a good movie, although I do feel it is the weakest of the three. It simply tries to do too much. There are 3 villains, each with their own plotline, the entire black suit storyline, the Gwen Stacy subplot, and the whole proposal/relationship collapse story arc between Peter and MJ. It's just too much for one movie, and many of these plotlines suffer from not getting the time they deserve to grow and develop. Venom is little more than an afterthought, when he really could have carried a film as a villain all on his own. (Of course, Raimi supposedly wanted the Vulture instead of Venom originally, so I suppose we should be thankful after all!)
Harry-- the new Goblin-- has a character arc that is logical and satisfying, and true to the comics which are the film's source. Eddie Brock is developed as Peter's rival at the Daily Bugle, and is given a much better development prior to becoming Venom than the character originally recieved in the comics. Venom himself is a visual feast, and one wishes he had gotten a lot more screen time. Hopefully, he will return in a future film. The design is very close to the comics, with the major difference the addition of a warped web pattern that is a mockery of Spider-Man's costume, a brilliant design tweak that improves an already excellent design.
Some of the movie's most entertaining scenes are those in which we see Peter acting like a different person under the influence of the symbiote costume. He's selfish, arrogant, flashy, greedy, and lecherous; in short, everything Peter normally is not. These scenes are a lot of fun.
The Sandman is played in a sympathetic light, a wise choice for this character. Thomas Hayden Church does a good job with the role, bringing a lot of pathos to a character that many would have played as a simple muscle-bound thug. The Sandman effects are generally very good, particularly the "sand cloud" effect used when he travels through the air.
In the end, I think the movie and characters would have been better served by leaving Venom for the sequel. Go ahead and set up Brock and the symbiote costume as they are in the movie, and end the movie having established that the costume is influencing Peter for the worst. Then, the next movie could have dealt with that, as well as Venom, devoting the time both of those plotlines really need to reach their full potential. As it is, both feel as if they were hurt considerably by being trimmed to fit into the alloted time.
Anyhow, without rambling further, I do recommend this movie to anyone who enjoyed either of the first two movies, or if you just enjoy a good adventure romp. Chances are that everyone who is reading this has either already seen it, or is planning to, but if you are on the fence, I say go check it out. Just don't hold it to the same standard as Batman Begins, the Richard Donner/Christopher Reeve Superman, or even the first two Spider-Man movies.
See my Myspace profile!
CHECK OUT MY BLOG!
Edited by Drunken Fist on 10-05-2007 01:13 |
|
|
| RE: Spider-Man 3 Thread -
Posted on 10-05-2007 07:15 |
|
|
batboy99
W. Tech. Manager
Awards:
None
|
Posts: 1550
Location: Toronto,Ontario Canada
Joined: 20.10.05
|
|
|
Phil wrote:
flash movie...maybe in the next few years? lol. and JL probably when we're too old to care. i think a JL movie would be fine in 2 hrs. all they need is 7 members and an alien invasion. just think war of the worlds with superheroes to fight them off, lol. nah dude,ill still care,my dads 40 and he's still a comic fan and hes been one since he was really young
Batman YTB is the best site on the net!
|
|
|
| RE: Spider-Man 3 Thread -
Posted on 26-06-2007 02:34 |
|
Kal-EL
Gotham Civilian
Awards:
|
Posts: 280
Location: Gotham City
Joined: 05.08.05
|
|
IMO Spider-man 3 is the best of the trilogy . (many people who didn't like the film, didn't understand it .)
|
|
|
| RE: Spider-Man 3 Thread -
Posted on 26-06-2007 17:59 |
|
|
batboy99
W. Tech. Manager
Awards:
None
|
Posts: 1550
Location: Toronto,Ontario Canada
Joined: 20.10.05
|
|
SM3 was my second fav, SM1 was my first, i find SM2 overrated
Batman YTB is the best site on the net!
|
|
|
| RE: Spider-Man 3 Thread -
Posted on 27-06-2007 07:25 |
|
callingcard
Arkham Inmate
Awards:
None
|
Posts: 118
Joined: 15.08.06
|
|
 SM 3 wuz the greatest film ever!! When does it come out on DVD?
" Take this guy...armed roberry, double homicide. Got a taste for the theatrics like you and leaves a calling card." Gordon BB |
|
|
| RE: Spider-Man 3 Thread -
Posted on 27-06-2007 11:55 |
|
|
batboy99
W. Tech. Manager
Awards:
None
|
Posts: 1550
Location: Toronto,Ontario Canada
Joined: 20.10.05
|
|
NO............ just no, it was good but definetly not the createst film ever, there were alot of plot holes and mistakes in it
Batman YTB is the best site on the net!
|
|
|
| RE: Spider-Man 3 Thread -
Posted on 06-08-2007 17:58 |
|
XforeverXknightX
Blue Collared Worker
Awards:
None
|
Posts: 440
Location: Gotham City
Joined: 07.08.05
|
|
they should have expanded it into another movie. Instead it felt a little crammed.
I was satisfied I guess, but I could have gone without some of the extra cheese that was stashed in some scenes. oh well
"I went around the world, searched in all the shadows. And there is something out there in the darkness, something terrifying, something that will not stop until it gets revenge... Me"
Check out my fan fics!!!
http://batmanytb.com/forum/viewthread.php?forum_id=35&thread_id=219
http://batmanytb.com/forum/viewthread.php?forum_id=35&thread_id=220
http://www.batmanytb.com/forum/viewthread.php?forum_id=35&thread_id=864 |
|
|
| RE: Spider-Man 3 Thread -
Posted on 06-08-2007 18:12 |
|
|
Phil
Vigilante
Awards:
|
Posts: 2061
Location: Gotham City
Joined: 30.07.05
|
|
it wasnt bad by any means..i mean it wasnt like batman and robin. in fact, a lot of people actually liked it.
theyre going for 4, 5, and 6 from what i hear. there might be a change in cast or something.
http://batmanytb.com/pictures/thumbnails.php?album=4 |
|
|
| RE: Spider-Man 3 Thread -
Posted on 07-08-2007 00:24 |
|
Caleson
Dark Knight
Awards:
None
|
Posts: 1631
Location: Rockville, IA
Joined: 24.06.05
|
|
I'm surprised this thread is still active. Then again, it's one of our biggest ever...
I honestly don't get all the negative criticism over this film. As a casual Spider-Man fan, I'd have to say that Spider-Man 3 was one of the best superhero films I've ever seen - definitely in my Top 5. It had a passionate story that stayed relatively true to the comics and largely refrained from corny dialogue that the first Spider-Man film often fell victim to. Yes, it was very cramped and yes it could've easily been split into two films, but pound-for-pound, I thought it was an excellent film.
I occasionally go to a monthly local meeting/get together with a group of hardcore comic book geeks, most of them in their 30s and 40s (we're known as the Just-Us League of Dubuque). The last one I went to was a backyard cookout in June, and I couldn't believe the narrow range of comments when S3 was brought up. Practically all anyone said were negative criticisms on the symbiote, the new costumes, or arrangement/portrayals of characters. Some criticism was defended by other people at the cookout, but outside of those minor defenses, I can't recall anyone giving outstanding praise to the film at all.
Anyone that's been a comic book fan for the last decade or two knows that getting a comic book movie, let alone one that's actually good and stays true to the source material, doesn't happen too often. It's just strange to me that after all the work and brilliance is put into these films that, at the same time, stay quite true to the source material, they're only to be criticized by annoyed "hardcore" fans. We should realize by now that we'll never be 100% pleased with any comic book film and that what Marvel's producing now will likely be, in our lifetime, the best live action representation of these characters.
 |
|
|
| RE: Spider-Man 3 Thread -
Posted on 07-08-2007 01:36 |
|
|
Phil
Vigilante
Awards:
|
Posts: 2061
Location: Gotham City
Joined: 30.07.05
|
|
i didnt like the dancing or crying, but everything else was ok. the crying was a bit...uhh i dont know. i wasnt feeling it. i felt like laughing at times. and i still think venom didnt die.
http://batmanytb.com/pictures/thumbnails.php?album=4 |
|
|
Home
